The Higgs boson completed the standard model, but #darkmatter says thereโs more to the story ๐๐ฅ
What do you think is out there waiting to be discovered? Drop your thoughts below!
Check out our second channel, @StarTalkPlus
Get the NEW StarTalk book, ‘To Infinity and Beyond: A Journey of Cosmic Discovery’ on Amazon: https://amzn.to/3PL0NFn
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/startalkradio
FOLLOW or SUBSCRIBE to StarTalk:
Twitter: http://twitter.com/startalkradio
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/StarTalk
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/startalk
About StarTalk:
Science meets pop culture on StarTalk! Astrophysicist & Hayden Planetarium director Neil deGrasse Tyson, his comic co-hosts, guest celebrities & scientists discuss astronomy, physics, and everything else about life in the universe. Keep Looking Up!
#StarTalk #NeildeGrasseTyson
source
And then, of course , there is just โthe force.โ
This is the kind of stuff that makes learning so exciting! Stay curious!
๐ญ๐
Something about dark matter makes me feel dubious, similar to disproven Newtonian aether, feels like something else going on we donโt understand yet and dark matter like aether was just plugged in to tie things up neatly.
Photons aren't actually particles. It's just light waves emitted by atoms, propagating through space as a Gausian wave packet at (t)ime. As the wave is absorbed by the EM field of existing target particles, it gives the false impression of a particle as the existing target particle is measured as an increase in voltage. But that does not indicate a particle was absorbed. It merely indicates that the EM field of the target particle was excited. The photon "particle" doesn't exist.
So yea, the basis for the standard model is wrong. And that's probably why you're running into problems with dark energy and such as we observe the wave packet stretched to infinity through space. The photon needs re-quantification.
Trump and MAGA discount most science. Wish you guys would defend scientists working outside your field.
So the question I have is if Dark Matter is 75%+ of the universe, why can't we detect it's local effects? So far we only know of it's existence because galaxies we observe would fly apart if only contained matter we know about.
I'm all into the Tau & the other Neturinos, as well as Dark Matter & Dark Energy.
More? Like those pesky tachyons..? ๐๐คช
Here's a fact: Anyone spawning randomly within the observable Universe on average would need to travel 6m light years before being able to touch.. anything.
Dao
All this knowledge, and $4 will get you a cup of coffie at 711, how does it feel to have wasted your life?
Neil set himself up for a humble-brag. ๐
The three electron like particles is how old? A few decades? What gives them credence or even validity? The 'Oh look, we discovered Higgs boson yet again and thus…?' Seriously? I have a hypothesis that the smallest particle is an electron where ALL particles are divisible by evenly. None of this "goes through us" baloney without a rational explanation!?! BTW the three electron like particles are most likely angular rotation on the Cartesian planes..
For clarity, 6 + 3 = 9 quarks and electron
9 + 3 = 12 adding neutrinos
12 + 3 = 15 including financial force particles
(He specifically did not count gravity)
15 + 1 = 16 with the Higgs
So is it about 17 or did I miscount?
"The tao"? lol…tau
Threes ….
What if each of these has three "types" with the undiscovered ones being contributors to the "Dark" energy that we haven't figured out how to measure yet ?
Having three in each makes sense in a three dimensional universe. (Ignoring the "Time" aspect for this discussion.)
Three dimensions BECAUSE of three "types" of rudimentory particles.
If gravity is the warping of the space time fabric, then doesnt that mean its not a force?
Well, because gravity is not a force. It's what we call the reaction of space-time pushing back towards its normal state. Like wind, simply a reaction of different forces.
And we do know the particles are vibrations in/from the quantum field that they belong to, which is all part of the space-time mesh.
Just play the Fundamental incremental to learn all about it! :)
There is no graviton.
That's why gravity doesn't fit as a particle-based, boson-based force.
We haven't found it because it isn't there.
also known as "I need to make sure I have tenure until the day i d!e"
Whatโs the non-standard model?
Feels like a joke that we live in a world where these things are discussed and discovered and yet get people who elect Donald.
So funny, hes like .pffft we don't even know what that is, total mistery.๐๐๐
I WONDER WHY SO MANY KIDS HAVE AUTISM ๐ค
DEMOCRATS ARE SO SCARED OF THE TRUTH ๐๐
Can we start grow an environment connection similar to the gaia theory?
Gravity, density, cell duplication, decoherence arrow theory, dark matter/ether or what you will next come up with?
Fudge๐ there's no mysteries but individual truths within the 2/3 of reality.
Standard model 2/3, the 3e individual, creating a diversity instead of that robotic one truth.
The more we discover, the more we have to unlearn what we have learned.