Scientists have captured the universeโs earliest moments with stunning precision! The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) has provided the most detailed images of the Cosmic Microwave Background, offering new insights into the birth of the cosmos, dark matter, and dark energy. This breakthrough is rewriting our understanding of the universeโs evolution. Watch as we break down this monumental discovery and its implications for the future of cosmology! Donโt miss outโsubscribe now for more cosmic revelations.
paper link:
Chapters:
00:00 Introduction
01:06 The ACT Telescope and Its Revolutionary Imaging
03:37 Cosmic Microwave Background as a Window to the Past
05:37 Implications for Dark Matter and Dark Energy
07:40 Outro
08:01 Enjoy
MUSIC TITLE : Starlight Harmonies
MUSIC LINK :
Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:
www.nasaspacenews.com
Follow us
Facebook:
Twitter:
Join this channel to get access to these perks:
#NSN #NASA #Astronomy#Cosmology #BigBang #Universe #Astronomy #Space #DarkMatter #DarkEnergy #Science #NASA #ACTelescope #Astrophysics #CosmicOrigins #Physics #Galaxies #Telescope #ScientificDiscovery #MilkyWay #CosmicInflation #TimeTravel #ExpansionOfTheUniverse #BlackHoles #HubbleTension #QuantumPhysics #SpaceExploration #SpaceScience #CMB #PlanckSatellite #PhysicsBreakthrough #TheoreticalPhysics #EarlyUniverse #Astrobiology
source
But, what created the mass that banged?
How can we verify that it's "accurate"? Humanity has had it wrong with the Bing Bang, for starters, and many others.
The biggest question is, why dark energy is expanding the universe more rapidly now than right after the Big Bang? How does the force of dark energy outpace the force of gravity? Is it possible that gravity is a class of dark energy? What other classes of dark energy are out in the Universe? This still remains a mystery.
I believe they have already detected the gravitational waves…….. a few years ago !!!!
Regarding WHAT IS E=MC2, the c is necessarily squared in order to allow for the fourth spatial dimension/TIME AND TIME dilation; AS gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are (CLEARLY) proven to be linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy IS GRAVITY; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE (AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is DIRECTLY derived from what is F=MA); AS two AND three dimensional SPACE are BALANCED in accordance WITH WHAT IS the FOURTH spatial dimension/TIME !!!! (Again, consider TIME AND TIME DILATION ON BALANCE !!!!) SO, now consider WHAT IS THE EYE (ON BALANCE) !!!! Alas, we overlay what is THE EYE in relation to WHAT IS the Sun, thereby perfectly and CLEARLY solving WHAT IS the coronal heating "problem" !!!! (I have CLEARLY proven WHAT IS the FOURTH spatial dimension/TIME, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy IS GRAVITY. INDEED, I have CLEARLY explained WHAT IS TIME DILATION !!!!)
By Author Frank Martin DiMeglio
schon wieder – deutscher Titel und dann nur englischer Text!
Why are you putting a German title under an English video?
Shitty clickbait!
nice, but what was prior the big bang ??
anyhow – i m 70y old and will live maybe 20 years on – so what I should be interested in the big bang. In case I would know it, it wouldm't change anything for me.
But Trump is still causing losses of wellfaire (aswell forme in Germany) – and nobody is stopping him in US ???
Yeah , like Ducks!!!! Stop pretending you have it all figured. You change your theories as fast as a baby gets his diaper changed. You know NOTHING!!!
The beginning of the current cycle?
I hate these AI videosโฆ
It took you eleven seconds to contradict yourself.
Clic bait and retarded. Bocked.
Dark matter and dark energyโjust placeholders for the 95% of the universe we canโt explain. Imagine writing a science paper where 95% is 'TBD' and still calling it a model.
Even as a youth I doubted the Big Bang, I haven't changed my mind.
Basing the beginning of the Universe on the apparent rate of expansion is the logic of a child.
Lack of evidence for dark matter is evidence for dark matter? I understand the claim is that it fits models and predictions but come on
Funding must be waning so they had to come up with a doosie before USAID is completely cleaned up! A Priori presupposition in, Total BS out. That's an astronomical joke, just another quicksand quote bubbling up and soon to burst so another can take it's place. Scientists maintain control by pushing the problems farther and farther away from scrutiny and where time is rather incomprehensible, but they managed to take some pretty cool closeups as proof. I'm shaking my head right now if it isn't obvious!
How can the claim be made that the Universeโs earliest moments have been โcapturedโ when we canโt even see the whole universe? We have no idea how big the Universe actually is, how far it extends beyond the portion of it we are able to observe.
The confidence and certainty of the video is outmatched by the scepticism and suspicion of the comments.
Doesn't anybody believe in science anymore? I'm not one bit surprised or sorry…
What a clickbait load of bs . Fucking bot farms man, ruin everything .
I donโt believe that there was a beginning. More likely the universe is on a loop and there is no beginning and no end.
This is false information, this is more clickbait based on theories that can't be proven or unproven
I had a beer each time he repeated himself. Hic!
Another guess, it's always the breakthrough until the next breakthrough, scientist did not capture the birth of the universe I guarantee it, some humility might be an idea as it's a theory until the next theory overrides it.
Hitting "Do Not Recommend" on this clickbait channel.
Okay … here it is …. if the big bang is true and with all the data we have ….. where is the centre of the universe
''Just Captured the Birth of the Universe'' is nonsense. The ACT telescope is more sensitive. That's all this video says. Nothing else is new. No ''Breakthrough''. Just sales hype.
Might just be some stars very very near us with trillions upon trillions of other stars beyond them. We might be too desperate!
I find a little confusion [understandably] between Big Bang and Start of the Universe. We actually know nothing and recoil from the word Infinity, which I think, is the only word to be trusted. But I know nothing and freely admit it.
If this is the evidence of how our Universe started, this is great news indeed.
Until weโre actually there. This is all pretty much pointless. What good is this knowledge? It provides no evidence of anything.
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Scientists MIGHT have captured evidence TO HELP EXPLAIN WHAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN the birth of the universe.
They should turn the telescope around and view how many braincells they burned through making this video
I'm still not 100 % convinced there was a big bang, or that the universe is only 13.8 billion years old. But it is good to see we are continuing to collect data to refine our models of the early universe.
No matter which direction you look, it should all look the same.
You didnโt tell me anything
99% empty words, commercial-like endless repetitions of emphatic phrases and zero info. Never seen such a bad doc, not worth of the channel's name!
This channel is pure ai crap!
We may witness the birth of a black hole.
I think this is more Religion than Science. God, Big Bang, same thing. In the scope of infinity & the void that it occupies, the Big Bang is a single firefly in the dark forest. Barely a "Blip" on the radar. It's highly unlikely that this idea holds any credence, it's more likely akin to the superstitious dribble on the stones of Gรถbeklitepe, animals that recently learned how to "agriculture". Delusions of Grandeur.
And what was before the big bang??? So this was not any kind of beginning alright!
GREAT VIDEO
the big bang is big bull
incorrect
I really love videos like these ……..I just hate it when it's presented as fact. The fact is they don't know so tell it like it is…….a theory
Forward and backyard universe
The used car sales equivalent to cosmology. Itโs got every option imaginable while confirming the expectations of the buyer to a โTโ. Itโs all there, all the buzzwords and at least 8 mentions of the Big Bang as if we have intimate awareness of it. NASA should sue to take back their good name from this channel.
What a load of bullshit!
The narrative seems more certain of the conclusions drawn from observations than is justified.