That's what science does…it discovers new things…theories change…knowledge progresses…the bibles account of creation is full of inaccuracies….and just cause james Webb finds something that doesn't conform to our current cosmological models in no way points to a god
That same man said the universe and everything is 6000 years old. Now he admits that he believes in what James Webb is showing…probably totally fogetting that all the immages took 13.5B + years to get to him and he`s actually happy like a horse on acid stating this as proof for his BS.
bro God created earth and stretched out heavens according to the Holy Bible. universe ans space are lies straight from the devil. btw earth is cca 6000 years old
Well, well. the Big Bang discredited! Scientists have actually proven their own theory to be wrong! And the best of it is, they used THEIR OWN EVIDENCE to do it! God, on the other hand has never changed! Since Adam & Eve first walked in the Garden, No believer has EVER said " That can't be right!" or "Are you sure about that?" No Sir! That tells you something, doesn't it?
big bang theory was suggested by a priest , hoping to find bible god in space and this has poisoned science ever since..
It was first proposed in 1927 by Roman Catholic priest and physicist Georges Lemaître. Various cosmological models of the Big Bang explain the evolution of the …
Dear CMI… from what i know, blackholes are a science fantasy/fiction idea. I am saddened that you guys as Creation Science scientists are promoting/giving oxygen to the idea of blackholes a real thing when Creation Science already faces an uphill battle in our day due to how pervasive the Evolution Theory is. Please see this video, done from a academic perspective from a non Creation Scientist, who yes, is a believer in Evolution Theory but at least shows how the claim of black holes is laughable "science" [Einstein's idiots] within their Evolution Theory view;
"Stephen J. Crothers on Non-existence of Black Holes & The Failure of General Relativity."
Also see this video that is done from a bit of comical position though still giving other angles of why black holes are not possible, Stephen Crothers is presented again later in the short video giving his views again from a technical astrophysics perspective, why he puts forth black holes are not able to exist and talks on Newtonian physics and Einstein physics;
"19 Why Black Holes Don't Exist (w/Stephen Crothers)"
The BBT is finished, guys. Just face it. Stop fighting God and just go where the evidence leads. It'll go way better for you and the evidence will make more sense.
That is the beauty of science, you form a hypothesis based on your current understanding then people constantly try to prove it or disprove it. Just because at some point it might turn out to be wrong doesn't mean it was not important for reaching the conclusion. Compare this to organized religion that used to burn people because they asked questions.
it's fascinating how these people try to use scientific findings to discredit science while simultaneously not believing in a significant portion of it. Also, someone should remind them that even if they were able to disprove the entirety of science, that would not automatically prove the existence of god
This must mean that the universe was magicked into existence by an invisible spirit-being outside the framework of our spacetime reference! Just as my favourite Roman Emperor sponsored binding of a random collection of ancient scripts says so.
Just because you find something unexpected doesn’t mean there isn’t a solution, a hypothesis is meant to be tested to find if it’s true that’s why people come up with hypothesis to find solutions. When it comes to God, there is no way to test the hypothesis whether he is real or not so you can’t just assume he’s the reason
See the full interview with Dr Mark Harwood here: youtu.be/SgSITin3obc
For more information and further reading, see:
→ NASA releases James Webb Space Telescope’s first deep field image – creation.com/james-webb-telescopes-first-deep-field-image
→ Secular scientists blast the big bang – creation.com/secular-scientists-blast-the-big-bang
→ Is the big bang really scientific? – creation.com/big-bang-scientific-theory
→ Can Christians add the big bang to the Bible? – creation.com/can-christians-add-big-bang-to-bible
That's what science does…it discovers new things…theories change…knowledge progresses…the bibles account of creation is full of inaccuracies….and just cause james Webb finds something that doesn't conform to our current cosmological models in no way points to a god
That same man said the universe and everything is 6000 years old. Now he admits that he believes in what James Webb is showing…probably totally fogetting that all the immages took 13.5B + years to get to him and he`s actually happy like a horse on acid stating this as proof for his BS.
Yeah because a. "God" is a much more plausible explanation. Have fun in your Grand delusion
🌏☀️I believe in the Big Bang Theory: God spoke, and BANG! it happened. (Evolution is a lie).
Scientist "we have new data that shows the universe may be older than we thought"
Creationist "ha! See this proves you were wrong" (while simultaniolsy believing the universe is even younger)
Please make this make sense
bro God created earth and stretched out heavens according to the Holy Bible. universe ans space are lies straight from the devil. btw earth is cca 6000 years old
Well, well. the Big Bang discredited! Scientists have actually proven their own theory to be wrong! And the best of it is, they used THEIR OWN EVIDENCE to do it! God, on the other hand has never changed! Since Adam & Eve first walked in the Garden, No believer has EVER said " That can't be right!" or "Are you sure about that?" No Sir!
That tells you something, doesn't it?
It is a theory…BBT…..and i trust science waaaaayyyyy more than a religious zealot. Go investigations go.
big bang theory was suggested by a priest , hoping to find bible god in space and this has poisoned science ever since..
It was first proposed in 1927 by Roman Catholic priest and physicist Georges Lemaître. Various cosmological models of the Big Bang explain the evolution of the …
Only dumb people find exactly what they expect to find. Science is about learning new.
Dear CMI… from what i know, blackholes are a science fantasy/fiction idea. I am saddened that you guys as Creation Science scientists are promoting/giving oxygen to the idea of blackholes a real thing when Creation Science already faces an uphill battle in our day due to how pervasive the Evolution Theory is. Please see this video, done from a academic perspective from a non Creation Scientist, who yes, is a believer in Evolution Theory but at least shows how the claim of black holes is laughable "science" [Einstein's idiots] within their Evolution Theory view;
"Stephen J. Crothers on Non-existence of Black Holes & The Failure of General Relativity."
Also see this video that is done from a bit of comical position though still giving other angles of why black holes are not possible, Stephen Crothers is presented again later in the short video giving his views again from a technical astrophysics perspective, why he puts forth black holes are not able to exist and talks on Newtonian physics and Einstein physics;
"19 Why Black Holes Don't Exist (w/Stephen Crothers)"
Regards.
Magic much better than a science that changes with evidence.😂
The JWST killed the big bang. It should not even be considered an actual theory anymore.
The BBT is finished, guys. Just face it. Stop fighting God and just go where the evidence leads. It'll go way better for you and the evidence will make more sense.
Scrambling?
No.
We are just slightly off.. corrections made..
There still is no god, sorry..
Lol
That is the beauty of science, you form a hypothesis based on your current understanding then people constantly try to prove it or disprove it. Just because at some point it might turn out to be wrong doesn't mean it was not important for reaching the conclusion. Compare this to organized religion that used to burn people because they asked questions.
See Refuting Relativity by Brent Shadbolt ✅
it's fascinating how these people try to use scientific findings to discredit science while simultaneously not believing in a significant portion of it. Also, someone should remind them that even if they were able to disprove the entirety of science, that would not automatically prove the existence of god
This must mean that the universe was magicked into existence by an invisible spirit-being outside the framework of our spacetime reference! Just as my favourite Roman Emperor sponsored binding of a random collection of ancient scripts says so.
Wow who would’ve of thought that science redefines ideas??!!! It’s totally not like we though the world was flat!
Just because you find something unexpected doesn’t mean there isn’t a solution, a hypothesis is meant to be tested to find if it’s true that’s why people come up with hypothesis to find solutions. When it comes to God, there is no way to test the hypothesis whether he is real or not so you can’t just assume he’s the reason
James webb..science fact
Big bang theory..science fiction!
space time and god are THE thing
its funny how the only people who are saying the big bang wasn't real worship a damn book character for a living
Universe might be older than we thought….
'SEE GOD DID IT!'
Lol man thinking he knows anything about how it happened
Wow God is so amazing, look at God 🙏😁.
So, rather than enjoy what science is finding we should believe the words of ancient mythologists.
Has nothing to do with the Bible or religion
Amen CMI 🙂🙏 God bless you
Thanks for your work and other
God stretched out the heavens.
So we're seeing galaxies that are billions of light years away, and this guy doesn't see any conflict with the young-earth model?
Amen 🙏 they're scrambling on new ways to lie their way out of it.