Does HC Verma spread Pseudoscience? ⚛️ #vedas #physics #hindu

So it's good he is mentioning in his work I don't know what these l this kind of people have by proving that this is already in our hi history what are you gone do about it , from my own experience if you live in few past you cannot have better future but it doesn't mean to abandon your past and no matter how great your past is you are only arrogant in the present

😂

Uss sadi ka Science unn books me mentioned they… thori na updated Science ya param gyan unme hai….

Murkhta ka Byapaar karte huye sharam nahi aati?

bhai ek kam kar tu, ved se mic aur camera bana ke video shoot kar le 😂 dress bhi vedic hi pehenna

Humare me hai humare me hai bolke kya ghanta ukhad liya. Sala mobile tak china banata hai. Aaj tak kuch ko chod ke isiliye science me nobel prize milta hi nei hai. Tum murkho ke wajha se

Pseudoscience hi hai

Mujhe es channel ye ummid nahi thi ki ye bhi bakiyon ki tarah ek video ka chota sa part uthakar us pure video ko wrong prove karenge

When i was in 11th i had seen that full video of HC Verma Sir(cause i was so fascinated with his while i was studying and solving his Concept of Physics) and I still remember he said that "There is the same concept of gravity and planatery motion already written in our manuscripts as Newton told but the formula for exact calculation of motion is what newton did different, discovering whole calculus to calculate motion of any object and others is what he did different

मै MSc physics
JEST qualified(AiR105) PhD स्कॉलर ( थियोरेटिकल/ हाई एनर्जी फिजिक्स)

वेदों की और लौटो.
पहली बात वेदों मे सब है अपना देखने का नजरिया है
दूसरी बात कुछ वेदों के स्लोकों से फार्मूलशन किया जा सकता है
और वही काम बाहर के साइंटिस्ट किये
नालंदा विश्वविद्यालय मे ज्ञान की सारी किताबें जला दी गयी.. सब अधूरे ज्ञान को बढ़ा + पढ़ा रहे
.. अगर इस बात को आप ना माने तो कई फॉर्मूले जो हमारे थियोरेटिकल फिजिक्स मे प्रयोग किये जाते. है बाहर के लोग चुरा ले गए
उसमे उदाहरण के तौर पर महान गणितज्ञ रामानुजन जी की दी कई हुई थ्योरी एंड फार्मूला को समझ सकते है

धन्यवाद
सहमत है तो लाइक करे ❤

Everyone must understand that while modern scientists and ancient hindu sages both work(ed) in pursuit of knowing the truth about reality, their approaches are completely different and have almost nothing to do wirh each other.
It goes without any doubt that the knowledge of ancient hindu texts is far superior to and closer to the truth than modern knowledge that is based on the naïve 'scientific method'.

And Since the truth is one, so some things match, but if people keep comparing both the things and keep on trying to search for results of modern physics/maths in hindu texts that would be simply ridiculous.

We do not need to find and show everyone that look we had discovered this millennia ago.. modern scientific method with its principles based on only 'physical' observations can not allign with a superior science based on human experiences of the physical realm and beyond, as documented in hindu texts.

Ye launda kuch b kutark krke siddh kr deta h kuch b 😂

The source of knowledge: Veda🕉️

What if someone tell that your home is so good not because it is safe or beautiful just because it can fly in the sky.
Is that not wierd.
Similarly vedas are popular for their knowledge connection to spirituality but you tell that they are good because of Science.
This is a way of disrespecting our Vedas and Sanatanis.
Listen to Acharya Prashant to know more about vedas.

Take the whole convo here people believe that everything about gravity was discovered in Vedas they just copied but no Newton gave formula and it wasn't in Vedas. Vedas are science but it's does not cover everything and all of it😊

Thoda to differnciate kr lo, philosophy aur science me anter hota hai, vedo me science hai bhi to hypotheis aur philosophy k hi form hai.. use modern science se compare mt kro , aur rumuors failana bnd kro..

Mathematical representation nahi he philosophical representation he

Par bhai waha saaf saaf suru me hi likha hai " perhaps " matlab saayad ye sach ho yaani HC Verma maanta hai ki ye ye ek bahas ka vishay hai, naa ki wo puri tarah se isse claim kar rahe hai..😏

Kassh Unlimited Dislike Ka Option Hota.

HC Verma the undercover librandu

What does AI says
Certainly! Let’s break down the claim about the *speed of light in the Rigveda (1.50.4)* and how to address it respectfully and logically:

—

### *1. What Does the Verse Actually Say?*
– *Rigveda 1.50.4* (translation):
> "O Sun, you who traverse all the skies, you are the maker of light, illuminating all the universe."
– This is a poetic hymn praising the Sun’s radiance and its role in illuminating the world. *No numbers, units, or speeds are mentioned.*

—

### *2. The "Speed of Light" Claim*
– Proponents argue the phrase "Yojananam Sahastra Dwe Dwe" (not from Rigveda 1.50.4) is used to calculate the speed of light:
– *"2,202 yojanas in half a nimisha"* (a calculation popularized in the 20th century, not from the Vedas).
– They convert:
– 1 yojana ≈ 8–13 km (varies by region/time period).
– 1 nimisha ≈ 0.214 seconds (based on ancient time units).
– Result: ~300,000 km/s (close to the modern speed of light).

—

### *3. Problems with the Claim*
#### *A. The Verse Isn’t About Speed*
– The Rigveda verse **does not mention yojanas, nimishas, or mathematical calculations**. The claim mixes unrelated sources (the verse is spiritual, the math is borrowed from later commentaries).

#### *B. Arbitrary Conversions*
– **Yojana**: Not standardized. It ranged from 8 km (Vedic) to 13 km (later texts). Cherry-picking values to match modern science is unscientific.
– **Nimisha**: Defined as a “blink of an eye” (≈0.2 seconds in some texts), but this is speculative. Ancient texts never used it for precise scientific measurement.

#### *C. Misinterpretation of Language*
– The Vedas use **metaphorical, devotional language**, not technical terms. Equating poetic phrases like “traversing the sky” to the speed of light is like claiming Shakespeare predicted rockets because he wrote about “fiery steeds.”

—

### *4. How Science Actually Discovered the Speed of Light*
– **1676**: Ole Rømer first estimated the speed of light using Jupiter’s moons.
– **1849**: Hippolyte Fizeau measured it with rotating mirrors.
– **Modern value**: 299,792 km/s (based on lasers and atomic clocks).
– **Key Point**: Science requires **repeatable experiments**, precise tools, and peer review—none of which exist in ancient texts.

—

### *5. How to Respond Respectfully*
– **Ask for Direct Evidence**:
> “Can you show me where Rigveda 1.50.4 explicitly mentions yojanas, nimishas, or a numerical speed? The verse I’ve read is about the Sun’s radiance, not math.”

– **Highlight Context**:
> “The Vedas are profound spiritual texts, not scientific papers. Forcing modern science into them disrespects both science and the Vedas’ original purpose.”

– **Question the Logic**:
> “If the Vedas truly had the speed of light, why wasn’t this ‘knowledge’ used for 3,000 years? Why did it take lasers and space telescopes to confirm it?”

—

### *6. Final Thought*
Ancient texts like the Vedas deserve respect for their philosophical and cultural value, but **retrofitting them with modern science is pseudohistory**. Celebrate them for what they are—not what we want them to be. Science and spirituality can coexist without conflating their purposes.

Bruh VEDAS , and MODERN SCIENCE are two different things
In one they mentioned things
In other they describe it briefly and use it in real life