Universe

Is the Standard Model of Cosmology Wrong? | Dr. Or Graur



The Vera Rubin Observatory is about to revolutionize astronomy by detecting up to 10,000 supernovae every night—an unprecedented flood of cosmic data. Astronomer Dr. Or Graur explains how this explosion of discoveries will reshape our understanding of stellar death, dark energy, and the evolution of the universe. The conversation also explores James Webb Space Telescope discoveries that may challenge the standard model of cosmology and the timeline of early galaxy formation. As well as the growing role of citizen scientists in modern astronomy, from classifying galaxies to identifying rare cosmic events.

supernovae,lsst,verarubinobservatory,orgraur,eventhorizon,johnmichaelgodier,time domain astronomy,transient events,astronomy,cosmology,space science,dark energy,big bang,exploding stars,future of astronomy,telescope,universe expansion,scientific discovery,astrophysics,sky survey,stellarevolution,jwst,galaxyevolution,highredshift,earlyuniverse,kilonova,hubbletension,standardmodelcosmology,galaxyformation,bigbangdebate,redshiftanomalies

YouTube Membership: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz3qvETKooktNgCvvheuQDw/join
Podcast: https://anchor.fm/john-michael-godier/subscribe
Apple: https://apple.co/3CS7rjT

More JMG
https://www.youtube.com/c/JohnMichaelGodier

Want to support the channel?
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/EventHorizonShow

Follow us at other places!
@JMGEventHorizon

Music:
https://stellardrone.bandcamp.com/
https://migueljohnson.bandcamp.com/
https://leerosevere.bandcamp.com/
https://aeriumambient.bandcamp.com/

FOOTAGE:
NASA
ESA/Hubble
ESO – M.Kornmesser
ESO – L.Calcada
ESO – Jose Francisco Salgado (josefrancisco.org)
NAOJ
University of Warwick
Goddard Visualization Studio
Langley Research Center
Pixabay

source

Related Articles

43 Comments

  1. Great episode! Refreshingly modest & "grounded" guest. Science can be thought of as a journey with an unknown destination. Like life. Edifice get built & used along the way but the caravan moves on. Thanks JMG.

  2. I don't see how you can create a standard model for dynamic systems. We know space, time, matter, and energy change every instant, so how can anything be standardized? The best we can do is approximate.

  3. Don't know why, I haven't changed anything, but your last few videos are not getting recommended to me until 2 days after you've published them. Not sure if this is useful information for you, just letting you know my experience.

  4. The one problem i have with math beign common language is that we dont know how they would conseptualise and communicate math consepts. The idea that one of something is one could be just not something they base their math concept around. Anyway, i think math as objective/universal language is very wrong regardless.

  5. When you have to invent fairie dust and mystic power to support your favourite hypothesis, I would suggest that you have a big problem. The alarm bells should have started ringing decades ago. Whilst you're at it, you might ask a mathematician what happens when you introduce infinities into an equation.

  6. Lithium liquefies at 1600K, Liquid Lithium Hydride forms at 900K. This attracts and binds to each other, forms the first stars, Brown Dwarf ignite at 83 Jupiters, then grow to form the first stars.

  7. 1:44
    Question….. "Will we recognize alien communication?"
    The next hour: Everything about the search but nothing about the answer to the question.
    There's approximately 10 MILLION species on Earth. We don't understand a single one. 99% of the world isn't even bilingual to human communication.
    The ARROGANCE is astounding.
    I still tapped the thumbs up button to feed the algorithm monsters because the SEARCH is interesting.

  8. Arp's 1972 paper about Stephan's Quintet was the turning point where cosmology should have zigged but it zagged. The Big Bang never happened. GR as it's been applied the last 50 years is mathmagics. There's no BB, no expansion of space, no Hubble constant, dark matter, black holes, or any of that. Gravity doesn't dominate the universe. Electromagnetism does. Galaxies birth quasars which evolve into galaxies. Stars form along birkland currents from Bennett pinches not gravitational collapse. Planets probably form the same way. The evidence for all of this has existed for decades but since JWST it's undeniable. Nevertheless you all persist in denial.

  9. When all your models are contradicted by observation, it's about time you pulled your head out of your a… and changed your theories to explain the observation.

    The universe is not gravity based. It's electric. The source of electricity is every atom in the universe.

    We get Aurora's because of trillions of amps of electricity coming into the earth along the ionisphere lines.

  10. Why are people not using common sense? Imagine shrinking earth to a size of a tennis ball. Then imagine doing the same with the sun. How much energy would it take? Is it even possible? Now imagine shrinking the whole galaxy into a tennis ball. That's impossible! And if it somehow was possible it would take infinite energy to do it. Then we have the whole universe…Yeah sure. BigBang never happened.

  11. Say we've measured Earth's surface gravity but haven't yet figured out the Law of Gravitation, so we think there's a "Law of Gravity" stating simply "Stuff falls at 9.8m/s²." And the 9.8 number is one of the Fundamental Constants of the Universe. Then we find out it's different on different planets…

    "Wait, gravity behaves differently in different places?!🤯 Physics isn't the same everywhere?!?!😱"

    "No, no, we just had the Law wrong. Turns out the acceleration value isn't a Fundamental Constant of the Universe; it depends on some other factors, according to this formula."

    "Ohh, ok that makes more sense. But hey, what's this big 'G' in the formula?"

    "Oh, that one is a Fundamental Constant of the Universe."

    "Are you sure?"

  12. 34:00 How about: "Bring me things that have not been selected by other people's queries."?
    Or: "Bring me things that almost matched a query, meeting almost all the criteria, but differing on just 1 or 2."? (to find anomalies)

  13. I discovered this channel back in 2017 along with the great Isaac Arthur back when I found out my wife was cheating and proceeded to very callously destroy our marriage. You two have gotten me through a lot, I know I can always count on them to take my mind off the bad stuff and give me hope for the future.

    Cheers to you guys! I wish there was more I could do to repay y'all beyond this comment of appreciation.

  14. IF it was right, it would have been 'fairly' easy for newer theories to finish the remaining pieces of it
    When I see Loop Quantum Gravity, Super String, and more exotic stuff TRYING very hard to fit last pieces in puzzle (of Standard Model + Gen/Spec Relativity) = clearly wrong

    When institutional scientists finally come to terms with this…we can start from ground up: reassess EVERYTHING (comparing to discarded SM+GR+SR), rebuild new set of physics theories entirely.
    …bcuz whatever is causing it to be wrong; stuff like Dark Matter/energy hints that its something foundational we're missing.

  15. Oh my, I remember the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. They had gigabytes of data that their computers of the time couldn't process easily. They basically asked anyone who'd sign up to sort the galaxies by type. Nowadays that same kinda stuff is done automatically because computers has gotten better over the years. However, with Vera Rubin and other astronomic observatories generating thousands of terabytes of data on a nightly basis, we're back to the old problem of too much data and not enough computing power to process them, perhaps we oughter resurrect the distributed computing concept again.

  16. no you do not need a first generation star at all, Dr R has shown this over and over and over again, they have crippled the stars with their bs thermodynamics defying models

  17. Imagine you know nothing about Asia. Someone hands you a document written in Chinese. You couldn't decode it. Fortunately we have direct contact with the Chinese and they can explain their system to us. With hundred or thousand light-year gaps it might be impossible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button