Physics
A New Quantum Theory Solves All Paradoxes—But Unveils a REALITY That Scares Scientists
#quantumphysics #quantummechanics #quantumtheory #schrodingerscat #schrodingerequation #einstein #reality #quantumsuperposition #Quantumreferenceframe
source
What exactly scares scientists???☹
Who or what is an observer? A human? a cat? A stone? A flower? A virus? Gravity pull? Light? an atom? Consciousness? Why the one and not the other? What causes or changes superposition or the quantum state? if you can´t answer these questions your theorie is incomplete.
I bet superman feels super when he assumes the super position
It's not randomness but free will.
By its very nature, the universe will always be unknowable.
Excellent video!
You don't understatement fully the superposition!
Observation is not limited to human perception. It is a reaction between systems—an exchange of information that has existed long before the evolution of eyes or conscious awareness. To witness something as a human is not to create reality, but rather to interact with the field that is already unfolding.
However, the depth and complexity of the information we gather as conscious beings allow us to manipulate reality in ways no other system can. The greater the "information package" an observer absorbs, the more influence they exert on the field they perceive.
As humans, we are the highest collectors of information that we are aware of, and through this, we wield immense power over reality. Our intent, which is the superposition of our reaction and potential action, becomes the force that shapes the world around us. Intent is the prerequisite for any action, and through it, we act as both the observer and the painter of the reality we experience.
Yet, this perspective expands when we acknowledge that all things are observers in their own right. From the smallest particle to the grandest star, all systems react, observe, and influence the unfolding of reality. We are the universe observing itself, but we are not the only actors on this cosmic stage.
This may also explain gravity as just an outcome to said reactions on the field.
Maybe our brain (filter) only allows us to observe it in one position but its still in infinite positions
The solution to all of this: You are living in a simulation. It's a virtual reality, a program, a "matrix." This VR/simulation can have any properties the creator of the simulation wants it to have. Its quantum states can be irrational and it won't matter. The simulation can force scientists down any rabbit hole(s) necessary to maintain the false reality, but in the end,…. there is no end. The theories about the simulation continue on forever, or until the simulation is shut down.
Quantum discovery is like learning gay people exist. It's F'd.
God created us with the same attributes as him. In Genesis, God created this Earth realm experience though his thought and word. We can do the same. "Reality" is flexible and we can shape it to our liking. This attribute has been suppressed by the "wanna be" controllers for centuries…it is high time we reclaim our inheritance. Neville Goddard for one, explains how. We are more powerful than we were taught…
Asi se la pasan los cientificos conmocionados y conmocionandose.
there is no box that can completely isolate a cat and a lab technician from each other – at least they can both still "feel" each other via gravity, which is not included into QM. therefore the classical Schrodinger equation is not applicable in this case and has to include gravity. therefore the consideration presented has no sense. furthermore, all the living beings on Earth are a part of a single biosphere, which must be considered as one single observer of the observable universe..
BMW e46 Touring 🙂
It must be that we are not the observer…we must be observing the observed…we must be measuring the measured…they spoke of watchers in old stories (myths) and of observing (god saw this that and the other) measuring the universe
Bingo! Case closed!
Define "observer"
We will never, EVER, figure out the “reality” of this “physicality”. Once we die, we supposedly get all the answers. Powers that be will have us going round and round just like the philosophers that have been philosophizing till now. It will always be one question, one missing link, one mathematical equation off, one area of uncertainty and incompleteness after another. IF! We did find out how to transcend artificially, brains would melt, mass hysteria, absolute insanity. Our brains are designed to comprehend this existence and this existence only.
Nah! The universe from the "Big bang" to "Heat Death" is just a multidimensional "Crystal" and everything that is , was or will is already determined. No paradoxes required. No free will either.
I suggest that it’s not just one door—that it is an infinite number of doors that only seems like a single door. Imagine an infinite number of perfectly clear doors arranged like the pages of a closed book; and each of these doors/pages, “infinitely thin.” But at the same time and much like a stack of panes of clear glass, the more of them you stack, the more they begin to take on a greenish tinge. Likewise, the infinite stacking of these infinitely thin clear doors takes on the appearance of a single, opaque, door. So when you “open” choose (say) “the apple door” all the other doors collapse into non-existence, thus, leaving you with only the apple.
I’m saying here that the reality “an observer” experiences is the reality we (/it) chooses. (That all the other doors are still there, but that they are no longer a part of our chosen reality. I’m saying that it’s not the electron that makes the choice; it’s the observer.)
Ive suggested this before but i dont think its the observer in super position, i believe its thought itself , the observer is the function that collapses the the quantum process “ thought” into reality , thought cannot be controlled, it itself exists in super position, any thought , any time, anywhere, now what determines if that thought sees light is the observer. You can have many thoughts, but you dont have to act upon them, and only when a thought is act upon does it become real. Now this can be directly related to this problem, but i suggest the observer is not in superposition here, their thought is. The thought to check the box to see if the cat is alive or dead, the thought to not check the box , and everything in between, i believe its quite possible that “ thought” is the bridge we have been looking for that fills the gap from quantum to classical physics.
Funny as the so-called "brillant" scientists are always "shocked" by things who looks like normal and lambda,
if not obvious for "average" people.
Perception is in a superposition
It must be embarassing to real scientists how easily everyone reverts to psuedoscience and metaphysics when they don't understand something.
Real Scientists do understand that the very act of observing or taking a measurement ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS involves an interaction. A single photon being emmited is an interaction.
Checking the spin of a sub atomic particle is an interaction. I am so effing sick and tired of this "consciousness" BS that I have had it.
I know that the Cat is not real, BUT supose someone took you literally!
Also I should point out that superposition doesn't happen by magic. A gate has to be applied to the quantum object to put it into superposition. Usually a Hadamard gate. So you see, when you make a statement like "the observer is also in superposition". It has no basis in Quantum Mechanics. People don't even understand that a gate is created through electromagnetic potiential.
I say these things in hopes of scientific progress in the field. Please go learn the basics of Quantum Mechanics before you propose new theories.
science was never meant to be a foundation on which we build our house. science is a boulder in the middle of the river of our life, changing and being changed. if science is not capable of growth it is only propaganda …..
The many-worlds interpretation isn't new. It's been coined in the last century. Dude, talking about a theory from the last century in a video from 2025 as "new" is lame. Besides, there's even newer interpretations, such as the pilot wave interpretation which, by the way, solves a lot of logical inconsinstencies. Then there's the ACTUALLY new view, that is considering the collapse of the wave function an effect of decoherence, which resolves the cat-in-box paradox rather neatly. Please don't call it "new" if you're ignoring the last 20 or so years in the field.